College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Student radical-trons clarify that they are controlled by faculty

By Royce Drake and Robyn Smigel

Guest Columnists

|

Published: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Greetings Humans: We are Radical-tron 3000™s, and we write to you today to challenge the ill-informed and spiteful accusations that we are not automatons. We were created by a select group of manipulative faculty and their Union allies to be the muscle in a larger plan far beyond our robotic understanding. However, we have come to realize, thanks to your infinitely helpful comments on the Miscellany website (“Eliminating positions affects livelihoods: jobs aren’t figures, but homes and families,” 10.29.09) and a circulating faculty letter (“Confusion surrounds recent exchange of financial data,” 10.29.09), that this plan is far more sinister than we could have imagined...if we had imaginations.

To those brave souls who called us “absurd idealists,” you got it half right. Yes, we have been programmed with multiple idealisms, including, but not limited to: “People Matter 2.0,” “There Are Multiple Solutions to One Problem,” and the beta version of “Social Justice is Something to Strive For.” Unfortunately, the concept of absurdity does not compute with us, as we are perfectly rational machines, but hopefully we will be more absurd once we upgrade to Idealism XP.

There are some who thought that we were humans experiencing a protracted childhood, and were victims of a system that allowed that. We must clarify that, being machines, we never had a childhood, unlike the rest of you students who are quite clearly much matured since the days when you played dress-up and had others prepare your meals. We cannot be victims—we have no feelings, thoughts or personal motivations.

If we had emotions, we would pity those who humanized us to the point of saying we believed ourselves “smarter...than the individuals who run our College.” As you must realize now, we cannot think we are smarter, since we are incapable of original thought.

We lack the critical thinking abilities and imaginative problem-solving skills that Vassar instills in its human students. Though we are not among the models built by Professor of English Donald Foster, we hear he has been busy in his laboratory this year. Being that we are manufactured goods, the claim circulated by four faculty members in their letter to their colleagues is irrational. Faculty could no more recruit us than they could a hammer. We were built to serve only those who score at least a seven out of 10 on the Marxian Scale®.

One commentator was more accurate in his assessment when he called us “Union pawns.”
We are not trying to be cool; we are merely replicating the functions of older models such as Martin Luther King, Jr., Henry David Thoreau and Angela Davis. Just like these previous Radical-Trons, we say that we are standing up for what we believe in, when in reality we are only following the lines of code in our hard drives.

For too long we have stood by and allowed others to hurl insults at us, claiming we can think for ourselves, that we may very well have our own motivations, and that we could quite possibly be manipulators in our own right. Some even say that the exchange of ideas isn’t always one-sided­—that people with different backgrounds and desires might actually work together as equals for common goals. These claims are untrue, and they would shame us terribly if we were capable of such emotion. We say openly now that we are robots (or, for all those bleeding-heart liberals, Mechanical-Americans), and we want all accusations to the contrary to cease.

We leave you with a few words from our databanks, though we don’t know what they mean. From Martin Luther King, Jr., in his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”: “Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas...But since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms.”

And George Carlin: “Don’t sweat the petty things; don’t pet the sweaty things.” Now we must reboot and recharge for another day of pawnery.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

24 comments

Royce Drake
Mon Dec 7 2009 11:23
@Reback

The line about childishness was meant to poke at people who say that we are the only ones being childish— we have no problem being "childish", but we wanted folks to acknowledge that they are too.

@Dickerson

Right, and a lot of people didn't find the cowboy piece funny. Humor's a funny thing in that you can't please everybody every time.

Mike Dickerson
Tue Nov 10 2009 17:57
I agree with a lot of what Reebak said. This thing is failed satire; I don't really know Robin, but I know Royce can do better; "Smoking Makes me feel like a cowboy" made me laugh out loud several times. It's a lot harder to be funny about something you're really passionate about than something more frivolous, and it's also harder to be funnier when the argument you're premise attacks is pretty much a strawman (strawperson?).

No one thinks the protesters are really "programmed by the faculty," metaphorically or otherwise. To attack that claim here just seems silly in comparison to the stakes of the debate. Why not use the platform to educate people about the work y'all are doing, and perhaps flesh out some of the substantial issues. You can even find some of those in the other comments (interspersed with an awful lot of namecalling.)

None of this is meant as an insult to the authors; you guys keep on saying your piece, just be funnier or stop trying to be funny.

Mikey Reback
Sat Nov 7 2009 05:35
I don't mind the satire, though I do mind the self-righteous overtones, such as --

"We must clarify that, being machines, we never had a childhood, unlike the rest of you students who are quite clearly much matured since the days when you played dress-up and had others prepare your meals."

So what's the implication here -- that those of us who don't live in co-ops and enjoy occasionally wearing silly clothes aren't as mature as you and your friends? Am I completely misreading this, or is that really what you're saying? If it is, you should rethink your conceptions of maturity and childishness; indeed, I'd venture to say you're being pretty childish by implying that anyone on campus who doesn't share your (somewhat radical) views is in any way below you, or otherwise worthy of being mocked.

Again, I take no issue with the satirical tone of this piece. I agree with a lot of what you say here, but this running theme of the radicals finding anyone not aligned with their lifestyles and ethics to be childish (it happened during the kick coke fiasco, too) is pretty disgusting. This isn't to say that "the other side" isn't guilty of the same fault, but I'd expect someone so apparently mature to refrain from stooping to that level. So maybe next time, stick to satire, refrain from sweeping judgments made on your oh-so-high pedestal? As more of a centrist-bot, I'd find that a lot more palatable... if robots had palates, I guess.

I'd also like to encourage anyone & everyone to use their names. If you're saying something you're ashamed enough of that you don't want it connected to your actual persona, perhaps you shouldn't be saying it.

Christopher Roellke
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:52
Dear Commentators,

I write with the hope that the current flurry of responses, many of which include unnecessarily personal attacks (both to the authors and to the commentators), will cease and that a more civil, intellectual exchange can occur. The MISC this week certainly has ample content which we can digest, debate and discuss. I urge us all to engage in a manner that is respectful of divergent viewpoints, perspectives and ideas. Addressing difficult issues through this type of venue certainly has its purpose, but please recognize both the limitations of the venue and its appropriate use.

Sincerely,

Chris Roellke, Dean of the College and Professor of Education

Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:46
Agreed Sarah. The activists lost Kick Coke, so now they're looking for another way to out-liberal us.
fruity pebbles
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:44
folks should read Letter from Birmingham. Nobody is trying to teach MLK through the miscellany. that quote makes sense to some of us, but we all come to a text with different reference points don't we?

sarah, hyperbolic much?

also the mission of the college disagrees:
http://collegerelations.vassar.edu/missionstatement/

choice quotes:

"Vassar College is committed to working toward a more just, diverse, egalitarian, and inclusive college community where all members feel valued and are fully empowered to claim a place in—and responsibility for—our shared working, living, and learning. The college affirms the inherent value of a diverse campus and curriculum reflective of our lives as members of multiple local and global communities."

"Recognition of the different kinds of knowledge and their scope and relevance to one another. It is necessary for an educated person to understand the relationships between the past, the present, and the future as well as those between people and their social and physical environment."

"# Development of the powers of reason and imagination through the processes of analysis and synthesis and the use of all our human resources—to speculate, to feel, to inquire boldly, to enjoy, to change, to create, and to communicate effectively.
# Increased knowledge of oneself, a humane concern for society, and a commitment to an examined and evolving set of values."

Sarah
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:28
these protesting people are so stupid. guys, do you realize that 99% of this campus thinks that you are jerks? get your heads out of your asses! when there is a recession, people lose jobs and spending needs to be cut back. families spend less. businesses spend less. colleges spend less. why is that such a difficult concept? the fact that people lose jobs is very sad, but our mission is not employment, but excellence and elite education.
Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:25
All arguing aside, this article is simply bad satire. I have no idea what the main point of this op-ed was.

Also, what a random quote from MLK. "Letter from Birmingham Jail" has a lot of phenomenal lines, and this is the one you chose? It doesn't even seem relevant.

beetleborgz
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:17
also a lot of us aren't teens anymore, but i bet you are.
thunder cats
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:16
it might be just you?

a lot of us got beyond worshiping humans.

when was the last time you actually read or listened to MLK? the similarities may be striking.

Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:12
I have a problem with a bunch of smug, over-privileged teens invoking the name of a national hero and a martyr in some form of comparison to themselves. Is it just me?
children
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:05
stop using us as an insult! how would you like it if we started replacing the words "boring" or "insensitive" or "dull-witted" with "adultish"??
street sharks
Thu Nov 5 2009 20:04
Kindly explain why people should not invoke MLK.

Let us beware turning human beings into deities. It starts clouding your critical facilities.

Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:53
Kindly don't invoke the name of MLK in something as self-serving and childish as this op-ed. The fact that you would even consider your work to be at all similar to his is horrifying and deeply offensive to a lot of people on this campus.
Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:47
You are irrelevant. End of story.
MLK
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:41
Your name # 1, you have no right to speak for me. I am fucking proud of you two robots! Oh, and Henry and Angela send their congrats on your satire. See you in the sky!
Robyn Smigel, '12
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:34
DCX -- only if Jesus was a robot

Your name #2 -- I'm getting really tired of anonymous critics! Either take responsibility for your words by leaving your real name, or keep your thoughts to yourself.

Your name #1 -- excuse me for trying to maintain some humor in the face of a constant barrage of personal attacks hurled from the safety of internet anonymity.

freshman -- uppity? really? Well you better come put us in our place! How dare we have opinions!

razorback
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:28
my ancestors have been getting uppity ever since they were called chattel. is uppity really an insult?
DCX
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:20
These activists clearly believe that they are Jesus on the cross. Martyrs you are not.
Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 19:15
I'm getting really tired of the CSWG. In light of Cappy's pay cuts (2009 AND 2010), their platform seems irrelevant. They're just incredibly pretentious and irritating.






log out