Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Alumnae/i raise concerns over alleged downsizing of English faculty, creative writing

Story developing...

Editor in Chief

Published: Monday, December 8, 2008

Updated: Friday, December 12, 2008 16:12

At a Dec. 11 faculty meeting, the first item on the agenda was an announcement from the English Department about the creation of a new correlate sequence in creative writing. "It's sort of like announcing that you're serving breakfast on the Titanic," said one faculty member. "The irony is extraordinary."

The irony comes in light of an alumnae/i and student effort currently underway to stop across-the-board budget cuts from dismantling Vassar's creative writing courses after Dean of the Faculty Jonathan Chenette met with the Department on Dec. 8 to discuss his desire to cut two adjunct English faculty members.

Administrators, including Chenette, had declined to comment on the situation on the record until after President Catharine Bond Hill send out an e-mail on Dec. 11 in response to the alumnae/i and student concerns. On Dec. 12, Chenette explained the situation to The Miscellany News, elaborating on the budgeting constraints that necessitated the cut in faculty spending.

Concerns began when several Vassar graduates expressed fear that by not renewing the contracts of two adjunct professors of English, there would not be enough instructors to teach creative writing courses. Mary Beth Caschetta '88 started the campaign a few days ago. Caschetta, who started a Facebook group to raise awareness and garner support, sent a letter of concern to hundreds of alumnae/i, encouraging them to e-mail Chenette, Vice President for Development Cathy Baer and Vice President for Finance and Administration Elizabeth Eismeier. The letter was also sent to The Miscellany News.

"Like every other institution in this country, Vassar abandons its artists when times get tough," read the letter, which went on to list more than a dozen significant Vassar writers, including Elizabeth Bishop, Mary McCarthy and Joe Hill. "Why would the College want to interrupt the future of today's writers? It seems to me, and I hope to you, that these bleak days of economic and political difficulty are exactly when we need to help young writers find their voice." Caschetta believes that the Facebook group will "undoubtedly attract" more interest in the coming days. The group already has about 400 members.

At Vassar, Caschetta was an English major who graduated Phi Beta Kappa and went on to found Caschetta Consulting, a firm that writes medical and pharmaceutical advertising.

Soon after the alumnae/i effort began, concerns spread to students, as the English Majors' Committee organized a meeting on the evening of Dec. 10 at 5:30 p.m. in the Rose Parlor to discuss the issue and devise a strategy for maintaining the creative writing program. The meeting attracted about 50 people, and several administrators appeared to be listening outside of the Rose Parlor.

The decision to cut the two adjunct faculty members follows the international economic downturn. The College's endowment has fallen over $200 million and Hill has been working with the Senior Officers on making significant cuts to the operating budget. These cuts are intended to preserve the value of the endowment. In an e-mailed message to the community earlier in the semester, Hill acknowledged that she would work with Chenette on reviewing non-tenure-track positions.

"We will not be filling any vacant positions, unless they are considered essential. The Senior Officers, along with the Associate Vice President for Human Resources and the Director of Budget and Planning, are examining all vacant administrative and staff positions to determine whether we can postpone filling them. The Dean of the Faculty and I are considering all faculty vacancies for 2009-10, including previously approved tenure track positions for 2009-10 and all leave replacements," read an e-mail from Hill sent on Oct. 27.

In her e-mail on the afternoon of Dec. 11, Hill noted that the Office of the Dean of the Faculty had been working as hard as possible to "reduce the faculty salary budget while maintaining as rich a curriculum as possible." She went on to write that about $750,000 of salary savings had to be achieved in the 2009-10 academic year. To do this, some non-tenured faculty members will not have their contracts renewed, and 70 to 80 courses will be cut from the curriculum. The College currently offers about 1,200 courses.

Some students and alumnae/i were eased by Hill's e-mail, saying that it proved to them that the administration was thinking through curricular decisions. "I think [Hill] is doing what she needs to do under extremely difficult circumstances," said one member of the Vassar Student Association (VSA) Council, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "They're not just cutting programs. They're trying to really evaluate teaching loads and keep the curriculum as broad as possible."

Others still hoped to change the minds of Chenette and Hill. English Majors' Committee co-Chair Kate Fussner '09 was "pretty upset" by the e-mail, and is working with fellow co-Chair and English Department Academic Intern Sarah Yurch '09 to craft a response.

Caschetta's reaction to Hill's response seemed calmer. "It's great that the President has confirmed a commitment to the creative arts at Vassar, and particularly to the creative writing courses in the English Department," she wrote. "We know that these are difficult times, and that the task she faces is daunting, but we have every confidence she will do the right thing and preserve what is special about Vassar. We hope she will view our group of concerned Vassar grads as a resource and an enthusiastic part of the community."

Earlier, some alumnae/i had urged individuals to e-mail Baer and the Development Office, and possibly should threaten to forgo their donations to the College.

Baer, however, said that she has received only about 30 e-mails. "I have seen a good deal
of misinformation in some of those emails about the facts of this situation," she said. "Our alumnae/i care deeply about the College, so I'm not surprised that many have expressed their opinions. Most have said nothing about their donations to the College," she said.

Caschetta has tried from the beginning to instill the importance of the writing program to Vassar administrators. "I, for one, will be proud of Vassar for producing a new and wonderfully diverse generation of writers," she wrote to the Miscellany. "Perhaps the College would be prudent to take some recent good advice from our new powerful leader and literary figure in his own right: Cut with a scalpel, not with an axe."

Numerous alumnae/i have become involved in the campaign, contacting administrators and starting conversations. Jon Li ‘05, a double major in English and Chinese, recently launched a rumor site where he will collect information on professors or departments that may be downsized. "I welcome those (old or young) from other academic institutions to chime in," Li wrote in his first post. "Personally I want more information about what's going on. Who'll be fired? What programs will be cut?"

English Department Co-Chair and Associate Professor Peter Antelyes could not confirm that any professors were being let go. "At this point, we don't know anything for certain," he wrote in an e-mailed statement. "We're now in the midst of the staffing process."

However, according to a faculty member who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the Department has unanimously contested Chenette's plan to eliminate two adjuncts, partly because those two professors are necessary to teaching the creative writing program.

"It seems like [Chenette] really hasn't thought this whole process through. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between working artists who are adjuncts, and other kinds of faculty members. In private time, they work as writers, writing novels, editorials, and things of that nature, [in addition] to teaching writing courses," said the faculty member.


"[Chenette's] vision for the campus is to drastically reduce the number of adjuncts on campus. He doesn't seem interested in having a thoughtful discussion about his vision of the College without adjuncts. This can't happen as a solo mission; it really needs to involve faculty to plan out exactly what effect all of this may have on the curriculum," the faculty member continued.

A different faculty member, who also spoke on the condition on anonymity, contends that Chenette planned to reduce the number of adjunct faculty before the economic turmoil of the past few months. "I would agree with the characterization that the administration, not just the Dean, is conflating two different goals: the removal of adjuncts and the financial situation," the faculty member wrote in an e-mailed statement.

According to one source, the English Department has offered "cash for heads," agreeing to slash its budget if the adjuncts could remain on staff. However, the administration has refused. "He hasn't taken the obvious steps that many deans of faculty have taken at similar colleges, which is to create incentives for retiring plans," said a faculty member. "This is something that other colleges have done first, and he openly stated to the English Department that he had no such plan."

While some students are upset with the idea of course reductions, Vassar Student Association (VSA) Vice President for Academics Camille Friason '09 sees the economic crisis as an opportunity to put budget demands in perspective. "Our curriculum has ballooned in the past several years with no real oversight," she said. "Our curriculum needed to be looked at with a fine tooth comb. This financial crisis finally forced us to do what was needed. Not that cutting faculty is the right thing to be done, but the budget constraint really is making us look at what is a priority and how we can re-shape our curriculum to give our students the best education possible."

Friason noted that Vassar offers many courses in different departments on similar topics, as well as courses with very low enrollments. "Overall, Chenette is looking at creating a strong curriculum once again," she said.

As to the specific plan to reduce the number of faculty, Friason wished that a better solution could be found. "I think it's really unfortunate that some adjunct and visiting professors will not be coming back next year. Many students have asked how they can help keep the faculty here, and i honestly don't know if they can."

Currently, Friason—the VSA's primary liaison to the Office of the Dean of the Faculty—is unsure how severe the loss of faculty members might be. Staffing plans are due to Chenette's office by the end of the week, which Chenette will use to make a number of decisions to trim the budget, including some combination of eliminating courses and eliminating faculty. Another option being considered is to offer courses less frequently without eliminating them entirely. These courses appear in brackets in the Course Catalogue on years when they are not offered. "I feel like that is something the department chair can ask majors for input," noted Friason. "If they had to decide to bracket X or Y, they should have students' opinions, too."

Vassar's peer institutions are dealing with the financial crisis in a variety of ways. Wesleyan University is planning to cut the 2009-10 operating budget by $15.5 million, and increase its student body by 120 students over four years in order to take in an additional $3.9 million in revenue. Wesleyan has also frozen all faculty appointments and canceled tenure-track position searches. Smith College has similarly frozen all new searches for staff positions, which now must be reviewed by a special committee chaired by their president. Dartmouth College President James Wright announced in mid-November that the College had lost $200 million within three months, and would see "fewer faculty employees in the coming years."

Chenette has not officially released the names of the departments whose adjunct or visiting professors' contracts will not be renewed.

The VSA Executive Board will be meeting with Chenette and Hill on the afternoon of Dec. 12 to discuss the situation. VSA President Jimmy Kelly '09 will bring a "large stack of e-mails" that have been addressed to him from concerned students, which he will share with the administrators.

Numerous attendees of the English Majors' Committee meeting on Wednesday night pledged to take more radical action, such as a sit-in or a letter-writing campaign, if progress is not reached between the VSA Executive Board and the administration.

 

This story is currently developing. Check back for updates. [Dec. 12 at 3:10 p.m.]

 

 

 

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

34 comments

Gary Greenberg
Mon Dec 22 2008 08:12
I just read about the creative writing cutbacks. Has the school explored creative solutions? Why not reach out to volunteers on a temporary basis. I'm thinking of the great published authors in NYC who might be willing to commit to teach part of a semester. You could have three writers committing to 1/3 of a semester apiece. And it would be the most popular writing course on campus.
Max Scher '07
Fri Dec 12 2008 19:36
Ditto to Mr. Rudnick. The most moving, inspiring, and challenging experiences I had at Vassar College were--for the most part--in classroom environments led by adjunct professors---I never even took a class with M Mark, but the one day I spent sitting in on a class of hers meant more to me than the majority of classes I took led by tenured professors in a variety of departments. On an administrative level, I realize that it would be impossible to fire a tenured professor before an adjunct. However, I wish to strongly emphasize the integral role adjunct professors fill at Vassar... I believe the passion for teaching seen in most adjunct professors (but specifically M. Mark) speaks volumes--their employment status is NOT set in stone, and yet they seem to foster a more exhilirating and enthusiastic classroom environment. [Something tells me my contribution to this comments list was entirely unnecessary... In summation, I would like to say, "Ditto to Mr. Rudnick].
MAE
Thu Dec 11 2008 17:48
For a small liberal arts college that values its small class sizes and low student/teacher ratios, the decision to cut faculty is self-destructive. Vassar "is renowned for pioneering achievements in education, for its long history of curricular innovation, and for the beauty of its campus" (http://www.vassar.edu/about/index.html). This is my second year at Vassar, I love the place and all the people I have met here. I do not want to see these or any professors leave. I came here for the small class sizes and the ability to get to know professors on a personal level. To be clear, I do not know the English professors currently being cut on a personal level. I believe that cutting faculty members is not in Vassar's best interest because it harms the community at all levels, and places Vassar's stance as a highly reputable small liberal arts college at risk. I realize that on top of being a school at heart, a college is a business. In terms of basic economic input and output, increasing the number of students and decreasing the number of faculty members would help regain finances. And perhaps in dire circumstances, when all other possible options have been exhausted several times over, this is what must be done for the institution to survive. If this situation qualifies as dire, we need to know this. Vassar community members need to know that all other options have been exhausted before this firing decision is made final.
08Alum
Thu Dec 11 2008 04:20
Jewett--
How wrong you are! Yes, science and math are becoming more and more important in this world. But neither field can teach you about humanity, because it is not measurable in all its dimensions and shades of gray. That is where writing and literature and art more generally come in. If the world is to change as quickly, as significantly as you say then my response to your thesis is this: you have it exactly backwards. We will not need strong writers and artists any less, but significantly more. How else to deal with these big changes everyone seems to agree are on the doorstep?
Tommy Rudnick
Wed Dec 10 2008 18:23
M Mark and Julie Rose are both indispensable to Vassar. Both professors have taught me in a non-creative writing environment, and both have inspired me, and others, to pursue what we love.
Even under current conditions, Vassar's endowment is extremely large (and much higher than most first tier liberal arts colleges). To start firing our best, beloved professors at the first sign of financial difficulties seems cowardly, especially when there are so many other ways to trim a budget.
Elise
Wed Dec 10 2008 16:37
Austin: I understand the problem is that the cuts aren't spread equally across the English department and that they're targeting the creative writing program; I agree that that is a fundamentally flawed approach to budget cuts, which should be spread out to minimize their impact on any one area. My point was that in terms of sheer numbers, the English department as a whole will still be better off than the CS department. And to Jewett: I think you misunderstood my comment a bit. I never suggested that creative writing was less important than physics or computer science (or any other science). I'm not even a science major myself (doubling in anth/indp). I just think that people should be aware of the fact that Vassar has a big bias against the science majors, both in the attitudes a lot of students and professors have on this campus and in how the science departments are treated by the college financially.
Undecided major
Wed Dec 10 2008 16:09
I think everyone can acknowledge that both the arts and more professionally oriented majors are important, and for different reasons. More importantly, I just hope that the college administration will be open with what they are planning. As a freshman, I'd hate to declare a major in a certain subject, only to discover next year that half the courses have been cut. If they want to cut classes, that's one thing, but to not make that information public as soon as they make their decision is really harmful to undecided majors.
Tony Viti
Wed Dec 10 2008 15:41
to anyone who posts on this board: please be respectful enough to use the NAMES of the creative writing professors in question. whether or not you agree on the course of action that Cappy and the Vassar Admin are considering, please remember that you are not just talking about numbers and budgets. you are talking about peoples' lives, people who (although you may not have taken a class with them) are considered invaluable members of the community by those who have been fortunate enough to be their pupils during our time at VC. so by all means debate about poetry vs. business (if that is what this conversation will inevitably descend into), but do not refer to our teachers and friends as "a few adjuncts."
Jewett
Wed Dec 10 2008 13:39
2006, I agree with your most recent comment about the importance of arts and sciences. But I disagree with the notion that they are "equally" important in this day and age. As education moves forward, I would imagine that sciences will becomes increasingly important and even more requisite for cultural understanding than subjects like English or classics. Our curriculum (and hence the faculty we hire) should reflect the disciplines that will matter most during our lifetimes. Creative writing strikes me as something important, but not nearly as essential as other coursework like physics or computer science, as Elise mentioned below. Our priorities should not merely reflect the present but also the future.
2006
Wed Dec 10 2008 13:11
Dear Oh Please, I'm sorry that you feel my comment was an implicit attack on the sciences. I'm currently pursuing a career in medicine, and value the sciences greatly. I believe that there is a value in a well-balanced education, in which money is put equally to both the arts and the sciences.
Dear Biochem major
Wed Dec 10 2008 11:43
As an English major, I would like to add my voice. I think it is important that no one assume we think our major is "the most important one because we write poetry". The thing that we are in an uproar about is that professors from the English department are in danger of losing their jobs despite how effective and hard-working the particular professors are. If the college proposed to do quality cuts, rather than just laying off those professors whose contracts come up for review, the situation would be different. There have been professors who have proposed that the college cut the pay of all English professors in order to keep the creative writing program intact. If that is their suggestion, then it seems to me that it isn't just English majors who are dissatisfied with the way this is being done. This doesn't have to do with "judging what we don't understand", it is standing up for what we believe is right. I do not understand your animosity, and I just hope that if this were happening in a department you felt strongly about, you would be doing everything you could as well.
Oh please
Wed Dec 10 2008 11:09
To 10:10 who said that the administration has been trying to ensure a "larger salary base" for graduates by directing resources away from English --- I strongly disagree with that. First of all, you are implicitly accusing the sciences of 'stealing' money from the arts. Are you actually prepared to make the argument that Vassar, or any school, should be funding the arts more than the sciences? It's not just about what will ensure graduates higher salaries; sciences are what will ensure that we as human being are prepared to enter the world as educated people. If that means diverting resources away from ballet or poetry, than so be it. But stop implicitly saying that the sciences are somehow unworthy.
name
Wed Dec 10 2008 10:25
Elise: That is terrible about the CS department--however, the cuts to the English department are not about the department as a whole, but about the creative writing program. The creative writing program does not even have 20 professors to lose--I believe it currently stands at 10 professors, 2 of whom may not be there next year due to these cuts. And then more the next year, and the next... The creative writing program is too small to be a major, and is only just reaching the point where you can minor in it. But if the administration does make these cuts, the creative writing correlate may well collapse in the next few years. As others have said, spread the cuts around if cuts have to be made. Do not target already struggling programs.
2006
Wed Dec 10 2008 10:10
A Vassar education is often valued for its ability to create independent thinkers. I left Vassar with a greater idea of who I was, and a deep sense of the adult I wished to become, partly due to the creative writing courses I took here. The lessons that a Vassar education teaches you may not be reflected in your starting salary upon graduation. But, they can be glimpsed in letters fellow classmates send me from their adventures across the globe. I’ve watched my classmates go on to get a master’s in women’s studies in Cairo, teach ninth grade science in the inner city schools of Baltimore, and fight hunger and homelessness in the Poughkeepsie valley. The diversity and breath of a Vassar education prepared and inspired them to be the difference they wanted to see in the world. Since taking over, President Hill has been dedicated to crafting a Vassar curriculum that emphasizes areas of study that will increase Vassar graduates base salaries. I fear that the cutting of Vassar’s creative writing faculty only highlights President Hill’s main objective. Even if you are not an English major, this cut should make you take heed and contemplate if your favorite department will be next. I truly believe that cutting out Vassar’s creative writing curriculum will weaken the very foundation of a Vassar education.
Austin
Wed Dec 10 2008 08:48
Elise: You are correct in assuming I know little about the computer science department. I never took a class in the department, and I graduated a few years ago. My comment wasn't meant to be taken as a specific comment about any department; I chose computer science as an illustrative example rather than intending to say anything about that department in particular. My central point is that creative writing is a huge part of what the English department is and should be about, just as creative options in other departments are what they are about. If all they did in any department was study and analyze the work that has come before, I feel they would be cutting the very life and soul of that department. High school is for analysis; college is for taking that analysis and DOING something with it.
Elise
Wed Dec 10 2008 01:50
Austin: First, I agree that cutting the creative writing program here would be an academic and intellectual travesty. However, your comments regarding the computer science department are ill-informed. As it stands the CS dept, which is already extremely poorly treated by the college (relegated to the basement of a non-academic building, shut out of plans for the future integrated science facility, denied proper funding, facilities, or professor positions), stands to suffer even deeper cuts proportionately than does the English department. While I find it wrong to cut an entire section of a department as is occurring in the English program, it is even worse to totally eviscerate an *entire* department, as is being done to the CS program. They are already under-staffed and cannot offer the proper classes to have a truly broad curriculum that is sufficient both to met the intellectual diversity inherent to a liberal arts philosophy and to adequately prepare majors for grad school or industry positions. One professor is leaving entirely, two others are going on sabbaticals and one is shifting to the media studies program and they only plan to replace them all with one visiting professor: this constitutes over HALF the department. While it is unfortunate that English is losing valued professors, at least they aren't losing 20. p.s. If you truly believe that web design is part of the computer science curriculum, I welcome you to come visit us in the dungeon that is the basement of the OLB. Things like graphics, bioinformatics, and artificial intelligence are far more interesting while still speaking to that importance of creativity and ingenuity that you mentioned.
2009
Wed Dec 10 2008 01:39
Of course there have to be cuts, and if the English department needs to be downsized, then so be it. But there are many specializations within the English department, from Shakespeare studies to modern and postmodern studies to medieval literature to creative writing. If they cut one professor apiece from a couple of these areas, it would not be a huge problem; the English department could get by with slightly fewer literature classes, because there are tons of those already. If they eliminate two professors from one area, and one that is fairly small to start off with, the whole creative writing program crumbles. Creative writing classes are some of the toughest to get into because of over-enrollment, and they draw on students across many different majors, far more so than most other English department classes. And most selective colleges have at least some amount of creative writing courses, some even have a major. A lack of creative writing would absolutely deter some students from applying. Everyone understands that sacrifices need to be made, but they can be made much more efficiently if the cuts are spread out, rather than focused in certain niches, thereby completely eliminating popular programs.
Dear The Dude,
Wed Dec 10 2008 01:08
This is not Dead Poet's Society, and for a very significant reason: in that movie, the high school's administrators were trying to squash Robin Williams' methods of teaching. They could have afforded to keep him without a problem, but their issue was ideological. If anyone actually believes that Vassar, the biggest hippie school ever, has an ideological problem with literature or writing, you're crazy. Our issue is that our endowment is sinking with the economy, and sometimes during an economic crisis we cannot afford to have every academic or social program that we want. I do hope, however, that they also slash ViCE's enormous budget next year. I'd rather see money go to academics than to silly concerts. But that doesn't mean we won't need academic cuts too. Welcome to the real world.
2011
Wed Dec 10 2008 00:40
the english department is already too large. we need that money now for financial aid and much-needed renovations to dormitories that are falling apart. when a department has close to 40 professors, i don't feel very sorry for them if they lose a few adjuncts.
Pre-Med
Wed Dec 10 2008 00:34
So basically the argument here is "creative writing is the most important thing in the world and we can't let our wonderful writers be intimidated by a troubled economy!" Maybe, just maybe, you poetry enthusiasts SHOULD be intimidated by this economy, and maybe the college is right to ensure the safety of our science and economic departments. Creative writing is great, don't get me wrong. But maybe you can take this opportunity to take classes that will earn you an income one day and prepare you for graduate school?






log out