Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

President Hill clarifies the College's position on staff reductions in light of economic crisis

Editor in Chief

Published: Thursday, December 11, 2008

Updated: Thursday, December 11, 2008 16:12

In a letter sent out on Dec. 11 at 12:52 p.m. to faculty and students, President Catharine Bond Hill explained the reductions in staffing that have generated some controversy among alumnae/i, faculty and students. She notes toward the end that "Discussions of alternatives are ongoing." A faculty meeting is being held today at 3:15 p.m. Please check back at miscellanynews.com for more information following the meeting. Below is Hill's message in its entirety:

________________________

Dear faculty and students,

As you know, many people on campus, with leadership from the senior 
officers and the board of trustees, have been working to develop a 
responsible and acceptable operating budget for next fiscal year 
within a context of extreme financial constraints.  As I said in my 
letter to the community last month, this work has involved reductions 
in discretionary budget lines in offices and departments and in 
positions in the administration, support staff, and faculty for next 
year.

Over the past few days, several of us in the senior administration 
have received numerous emails from alumnae/i and students who've 
expressed concerns about staffing reductions for next year in the 
English Department and the effects of those reductions on the creative 
writing curriculum.  I would like to clarify the facts about those 
reductions.

Jon Chenette, the Dean of the Faculty, with his staff and in 
consultation with me, has responded to all department and program 
staffing plans submitted for next year with recommendations for course 
section eliminations and team teaching adjustments that reduce the 
faculty salary budget while maintaining as rich a curriculum as 
possible. Our goal has been to recommend course reductions with 
minimal adverse effects on the educational experiences of our 
students. In total for next year we need to achieve salary savings in 
this area of approximately $750,000, which translates into a reduction 
of between 70 and 80 course sections from the total curriculum of 
1,200 course sections being offered this year.

In its staffing plan for next year, the English Department had 
proposed adding 11 course sections over this year's number.  In making 
this request, the department was seeking to maintain current adjunct 
and visiting faculty members' course loads for the coming year.  
Bearing in mind our financial circumstances, we asked the department 
not to increase course sections but rather to reduce them by two below 
the number being taught this year. The number of tenured and tenure-
track English faculty on campus next year is sufficient to support 
this curriculum with a lower level of visiting and adjunct staffing.  
Unfortunately, this means that two adjunct or visiting faculty members 
may not be able to teach in the department next year and others may 
have their loads reduced to the minimum levels specified in their 
contracts. Discussions of alternatives are ongoing.

We consider that a reduction of two course sections relative to the 
existing English curriculum, and the continued presence of a strong 
faculty with diverse backgrounds, among them several creative writers, 
will continue to allow for a robust creative writing curriculum.

The College has always had strong programs in the creative arts. Our 
commitment to the arts as a hallmark of a Vassar education is one we 
will continue to honor as we work through these difficult times.

Catharine Hill
President 

 

 

 

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Gah! 09
Fri Dec 12 2008 12:17
English Major Alum, I think we're going to see cuts in adjunct and visiting positions in other departments, too. On the other hand, some departments, like Economics, might actually be hiring more adjuncts or visitors because of the increasing number of majors and the fact that several professors have left the department (for a variety of benign reasons). This is a very serious situation where Vassar has no expectation of gaining endowment revenue, normally 1/3 of Vassar's annual income, and a lowered expectation of alumni giving and tuition revenue, the rest of Vassar's income. Next year's budget *must* be much smaller than this year's as a result. And when half of the budget is spent on compensation (wages, benefits, and the like), there's no choice but to cut down on compensation spending in addition to cuts elsewhere. Also, Cappy has asked for comments on where the cuts should come in one of her emails, so it's not like this wasn't put to the community for input.
English major '10
Fri Dec 12 2008 10:34
English Major Alum, I disagree. I think President Hill answered all of our concerns. Put yourself in her shoes: if she cuts from the Russian department, she'll have to deal with angry Russian students/graduates. If she cuts from the Biology department, same situation. She and Dean Chenette made a tough call, and we should trust that they are working as hard as they can to make the right decisions.
English Major Alum
Fri Dec 12 2008 03:38
I feel like it's important to clarify exactly what the concern here is, because given some of the responses, it seems like it's being misunderstood, if not misrepresented. It's inevitable that in a time of economic crisis cuts will be made, and it's certainly possible that, after all other alternatives have been exhausted, staff cuts will have to be made. No one is denying either of these two things. What is under discussion is why PRECISELY these two professors were chosen. It would be one thing if several of the larger departments had staff cuts, or even possibly if two English professors with highly disparate focuses were cut. But by limiting the selection to two professors within one department with the exact same specialty (an extremely popular specialty that is not exceptionally well-represented), the administration is sending a clear and unequivocal message about the importance (or lack thereof) of a robust creative writing program. If the college chose to cut two computer science professors, it would be a clear message that they didn't see the value of a computer science program; if they cut two professors in the Russian department, it would be a clear message about their feelings on the value of Russian; and their choices, as is, is a fairly clear statement on their feelings on the value of creative writing. This is a delicate issue without a clear or easy answer. But to respond to the concerns of the students, alums, and faculty distressed by this news with an attitude of "Well, we have to have cuts, it's inevitable" is to misunderstand those concerns; we understand precisely why there have to be cuts, but we would like, at the very least, a much more straightforward, open, and honest answer as to precisely why the cuts were made HERE.
2010
Thu Dec 11 2008 19:49
Source: Members of the English Department Faculty. The administration has thus far refused this solution saying it is only a short-term solution to a long-term problem
Your name
Thu Dec 11 2008 19:46
2010: Intriguing. Source?
2010
Thu Dec 11 2008 19:29
2009--The English faculty have actually offered, without being asked, to take a pay-cut to cover these professor's salaries. This option has so far been refused by the administration.
Student '07
Thu Dec 11 2008 19:02
Unfortunately, the nature of the tenure system means that in times of economic struggle, cutting adjuncts is one of the few options administrators have at their disposal. It's ironic, because the truth is that adjuncts do an amazingly difficult amount of work for very little pay, and so from a cost-benefit analysis, they contribute to colleges/universities far more than tenured faculty do. The Chronicle of Higher Education has an article out right now about the "adjunctification" of English departments. On average, it says, adjuncts make less than $3000 a course. If they teach 4 courses a semester for two semesters a year, we're talking less than $24000 a year. That's not even a living wage. Our creative writing adjuncts would be better off teaching high school, or doing almost anything else...
Anonymous admin
Thu Dec 11 2008 18:16
I know that this situation is very difficult for students to understand, but rest assured that Jon and Cappy have been working absolutely tirelessly to ensure that our programs are being protected as much as they possibly can under the circumstances. I want to remind readers here that Vassar has lost an enormous portion of its holdings. You will see in the coming months that schools across the country will be slashing professors and entire departments. Some will cut Women's Studies, others will cut Education. We are cutting a tiny fraction of the English department. I strongly encourage students not to overreact to this news, at least not without putting it in context of the unbelievable layoffs in the corporate world.
Also 2009
Thu Dec 11 2008 16:48
2009, that's absurd. By your same logic, why not ask all students' families to pay the increased amount of tuition necessary to "maintain Vassar's academic diversity"?
2009
Thu Dec 11 2008 15:56
Why not ask the professors to all take a small paycut and maintain Vassar's academic diversity? Why is cutting people the only option?
Strong House
Thu Dec 11 2008 14:44
2011 and 2000 physics major, are you kidding me? Do we really want to live in a top-down community where these decisions are made without the input of students and faculty? Certainly the economic times are troubled, seriously troubled, but that doesn't mean that they couldn't hold a forum or at least ask for budgetary concessions rather than make unilateral decisions so quickly.
2012
Thu Dec 11 2008 14:25
we should rent out the golf course instead...
Class of 2000 Physics major
Thu Dec 11 2008 14:24
I think I do agree with her sentiment. The English Department seems to think that it can get by without making the cuts that other departments will inevitably have to make. What makes me think that this whole ad hoc protest movement would never have existed if they had decided to cut a couple biology, physics or chemistry professors? The administration is correct to treat all academic departments equally (assuming that's what they're doing). Because otherwise, Vassar's artsy kids will quickly realize that the sciences will disappear for the benefit of the precious arts.
2011
Thu Dec 11 2008 13:35
Sounds like she's pretty angry with the English department for causing so much trouble. I can't help but agree though; we can't protect EVERYTHING in an economic crisis.






log out